Bennett v. Potter
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William M. Hiatt and Irwin, Smith & Rosecrans for Appellant. X
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The complaint is in four counts. The only controversy concerns the first and the third counts, each of which covered the same demand.
The plaintiffs were attorneys at law and partners in the practice of law. The defendant was the owner as tenant in common with S. W. Slinkard and Laura Slinkard, his wife, of 160 acres of land and certain crops and other personal property used on the land in connection with its cultivation, the defendant having eleven-sixteenths interest therein and the Slinkards five-sixteenths interest. In July,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Young v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Levine v. Bayne, Snell & Krause, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.