EDP Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is plaintiff EDP Enterprises, Inc.’s (“plaintiffs”) motion for a temporary restraining order. The plaintiff *499seeks to enjoin the government from commencing activities on contract no. DABJ41-03-D-0003 (“interim contract”), a contract for food services for the Department of Army, Fort Riley, Kansas (“Army” or “government”). Plaintiff objects to the bundled-service form of the solicitation for the interim contract. Plaintiff bases its challenge to the form of the bundled-services interim contract solicitation on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- OAO Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- North Carolina Division of Services for the Blind v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Software Testing Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Jones Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Geo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Marketing & Management Information, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003