Legal Opinion
Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation Services v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 19, 2003No. 03-2038CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Judge.
The Plaintiff, Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation Services (MDRS), brings this pre-award bid protest against the Department of the Navy alleging that the Navy has failed to afford blind persons the priority they are due under the Randolph-Shepard Act, 20 U.S.C. § 107 et seq., (RS Act) in solicitation No. N00140-03-R-1763.
*372The Defendant moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The Defendant argues first, that challenges to the terms of a solicitation are appropriately brought…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- North Carolina Division of Services for the Blind v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Beuré-Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Software Testing Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Wit Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation Services v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004