Legal Opinion
OAO Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 8, 2001No. 01-245 CPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action comes before the court on Plaintiffs Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff, OAO Corporation (OAO), protests the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to award the Facilities and Administrative Information Resources (FAIR) Management Contract (FAIR II Contract) to intervenor, Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC). Complaint (Compl.) If 1. For the following reasons, the court DENIES plaintiffs motion.
I. Background
OAO is the incumbent contractor on defendant’s FAIR Contract,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Hughes Network Systems, Incorporated v. Interdigital Communications Corporation, Formerly Known as International Mobile MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- A.L.K. Corporation v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Information Technology & Applications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Labat-Anderson Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Computer Sciences Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.