Legal Opinion

Mazurek v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 16, 1997No. 96-1104PublishedCited by 2,506 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1995, the Montana Legislature enacted a statute restricting the performance of abortions to licensed physicians. 1995 Mont. Laws, ch. 321, §2 (codified at Mont. Code Ann. § 50-20-109 (1995)). Similar rules exist in 40 other States in the Nation.1 The Montana law was challenged almost im*970mediately by respondents, who are a group of licensed physicians and one physician-assistant practicing in Montana. The District Court denied respondents’ motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that they had not established any likelihood of prevailing on their claim that the law imposed an “undue…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,506 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Angela Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

2,501 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API