Mazurek v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
In 1995, the Montana Legislature enacted a statute restricting the performance of abortions to licensed physicians. 1995 Mont. Laws, ch. 321, §2 (codified at Mont. Code Ann. § 50-20-109 (1995)). Similar rules exist in 40 other States in the Nation.1 The Montana law was challenged almost im*970mediately by respondents, who are a group of licensed physicians and one physician-assistant practicing in Montana. The District Court denied respondents’ motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that they had not established any likelihood of prevailing on their claim that the law imposed an “undue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,506 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Angela Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2,501 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.