Jones Automation, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This putative bid protest ease is before the court on plaintiff’s application for a temporary restraining order. After careful consideration of the memoranda filed by the parties, and for the reasons discussed below, the court hereby DENIES plaintiffs application.2
I. FACTS3
Plaintiff, Jones Automation, Inc., is a software development company based in Huntsville, Alabama. On March 24, 2010, it filed a bid protest action challenging the supposed decision by the Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) to terminate its contract…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Resource Conservation Group, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Coast Professional, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Munilla Construction Management, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- International Genomics Consortium v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Hallmark-Phoenix 3, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wallace Asset Management, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.