Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. National Union Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.

The questions of law presented by the record are as follows:

1. Was tbe National JJnion Fire Insurance policy duly canceled?

2. Did tbe plaintiff ratify tbe substitution or issuance of tbe Yorkshire policy in lieu of tbe National Union policy?

Tbe first question must be answered in tbe negative.

Tbe methods prescribed by law for tbe cancellation of fire insurance policies are discussed and applied in Dawson v. Insurance Co., 192 N. C., 312, 135 S. E., 34. Tbe plaintiff, for whose benefit tbe insurance was procured, knew nothing of tbe cancellation of tbe National Union policy, therefore, neither…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Waterloo Lumber Co. v. Des Moines InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Dawson v. Concordia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. BurtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. City of New York Ins. v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Belk's Department Store v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. The Celina Mutual Casualty Co. v. BaldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Belk's Department Store v. George Washington Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Hendricks v. Continental InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Board of Education v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API