Legal Opinion
Insurance Co. of North America v. Burton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 11, 1930No. 19579PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
This is an action to determine which of two fire insurance companies is liable for the loss by fire sustained by defendant in error,' N. M. Burton.
The National 'Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, through its agent, J. S. Hurt, issued plaintiff a fire insurance policy for $2,500 covering a potato warehouse located in Eufaula. The policy was dated September 20, 1926. The premium was $42. Plaintiff paid $20 on the premium. He directed the agent to attach a mortgage clause to the policy in favor of the Exchange Trust Company of Tulsa, and send the policy to it. The agent did not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Dibble v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Clark v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896
- Phœnix Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Hamm Realty Co. v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. BurdineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Farrar v. MayabbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Markel Service, Inc. v. National Farm LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Detroit Fire & Marine Ins. v. Oklahoma Terminal Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Home Insurance Co. v. Southern Motor Coach Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.