Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Continental Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1935No. Appeal, 278PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This case was tried before a judge of the court below without a jury. The defendant has appealed from the judgment entered on the finding in favor of the plaintiff.

The only question raised at the trial was whether the fire insurance policy sued on was in force at the time of the loss or whether it had been canceled.

The defendant took no exception in the court below to any of the findings of fact by that court. Defendant filed motions for binding instructions and for judgment n. o. v., which were dismissed. The question on this appeal is whether, on the facts, the court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. MonaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Levan v. Pottstown, Phœnixville Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. M. Arnfeld & Son v. Guardian Assurance Co. of LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Scheel v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Pomerantz v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Campbell v. Royal Indem. Co. of NYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Stewart v. Mullineaux (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Schock v. Penn Township Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Commonwealth v. Urban Mutual Fire Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API