Belk's Department Store v. . Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STACY, C. J., and BROGDEN, J., dissent. This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover $5,000 on an alleged fire insurance policy issued by defendant to plaintiff. The issues submitted to the jury, and their answers thereto, are as follows: "(1) Did the plaintiff and defendant enter into the contract of insurance, as alleged in the complaint? A. `Yes.' (2) If so, did the plaintiff, at the time of the issuance of such contract, have other and additional fire insurance outstanding on its stock of merchandise, as alleged in the answer? A. `Yes' (by consent). (3) If so, did…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Life Insurance v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Midkiff v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- N. & W. Overall Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Laughinghouse v. Great National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Howard-Bobbitt Co. v. Never Fail Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bicket v. McLean Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Kirby v. Stokes County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Williamson v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Smith v. . KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.