Legal Opinion

The Celina Mutual Casualty Co. v. Baldridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1937No. 26,943PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, C. J.

This is an action to recover $350 for the destruction of appellee’s automobile under a contract of insurance. The policy is dated July 18, 1930, but it was not actually issued until after the automobile was destroyed on November 25,1930.

The appellant answered in general denial, and in several paragraphs of affirmative answer alleged that at the time the policy was issued the plaintiff had no insurable interest in the automobile covered by the policy; that the policy was not issued until six days after the accident, and that it was procured through the connivance and collusion of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896
  2. Kerr v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. City of New York Ins. v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  4. Jernigan v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Wilson v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Cook v. Michigan Mutual Liability CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Farmers Mutuals Insurance v. WolfeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CondictDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1976
  5. Presley v. National Flood Insurers AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API