Legal Opinion

California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School District

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1997No. S051274PublishedCited by 352 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

We address in this case the proper interpretation of Education Code section 44919, subdivision (b) (hereafter section 44919(b); all statutory references are to the Education Code unless otherwise stated), which concerns the employment of persons to serve in “limited assignments] supervising athletic activities of pupils,” i.e., athletic coaches. Specifically, we must construe the portion of the statute providing that such positions, when vacant, “shall first be made available to teachers presently employed by the district.” We hold the language of section 44919(b)…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by352 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

347 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API