Legal Opinion

Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1991No. S011367PublishedCited by 404 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

Introduction and Summary of Decision

We consider in this case two issues involving interpretation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, §§51, 52; hereafter the Unruh Act or the Act; all statutory references are to the Civil Code unless otherwise indicated): (1) does the Act proscribe, as economic discrimination, a landlord’s requirement that prospective tenants have gross monthly incomes of at least three times the rent to be charged (the minimum income policy) and (2) can a female plaintiff state a cause of action under the Act by alleging that the minimum income policy…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by404 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kathleen Lentini v. California Center for the Arts, Escondido Alan Corbin Randy Vogel, and Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API