Legal Opinion

Flatley v. Mauro

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2006No. S128429PublishedCited by 387 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*305Opinion

MORENO, J.

Plaintiff Michael Flatley, a well-known entertainer, sued defendant D. Dean Mauro, an attorney, for civil extortion, intentional infliction of emotional distress and wrongful interference with economic advantage. Flatley’s action was based on a demand letter Mauro sent to Flatley on behalf of Tyna Marie Robertson, a woman who claimed that Flatley had raped her, and on subsequent telephone calls Mauro made to Flatley’s attorneys, demanding a seven-figure payment to settle Robertson’s claims. Mauro filed a motion to strike Flatley’s complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute.1…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by387 opinions

  1. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. Gonzales and SolizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Liberty Synergistics Inc. v. Microflo Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Mindys Cosmetics, Inc. v. DakarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. 1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

382 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API