People v. Christian S.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Under the doctrine of imperfect self-defense, when the trier of fact finds that a defendant killed another person because the defendant actually, but unreasonably, believed he was in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury, the defendant is deemed to have acted without malice and thus can be convicted of no crime greater than voluntary manslaughter. The question is whether the Legislature abrogated this doctrine in 1981 by amending the Penal Code to eliminate the diminished capacity defense. We hold the doctrine of imperfect self-defense was not abolished.
The 1981…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by284 opinions
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Middleton v. McNeilSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.