Legal Opinion

Navellier v. Sletten

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2002No. S095000PublishedCited by 644 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

The question presented is whether this action based on the defendant’s having filed counterclaims in a prior, unrelated proceeding in federal court, is one “arising from” activity protected by Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (section 425.16; the anti-SLAPP statute), which provides for early dismissal of certain actions known as “strategic lawsuits against public participation.”1 We conclude that this action arises from statutorily protected activity, but does not for that reason alone necessarily constitute a SLAPP or become subject to dismissal under the statute.2

Bac…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by644 opinions

  1. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

639 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API