Legal Opinion

Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 2006No. S126715, S126864PublishedCited by 350 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

In this case, we determine whether a litigant whose action was dismissed under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) may, in turn, invoke that statute as a defense to a subsequent action for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Peggy J. Soukup was sued by her former employers. She obtained dismissal of their action under the anti-SLAPP statute and then sued them for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Her former employers moved to strike Soukup’s action as a SLAPP. The superior court denied the motion on the ground that the anti-SLAPP statute did…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by350 opinions

  1. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. AbilezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017

345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API