Legal Opinion

Lungren v. Deukmejian

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1988No. S004740PublishedCited by 754 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We are called on in this case to construe the provisions of article V, section 5, subdivision (b), of the California Constitution (hereafter section 5(b)), which sets forth the requirements for confirmation by the Legislature of the Governor’s nominee to fill a vacancy in the office of Treasurer and other constitutional offices. Specifically, we shall decide whether under that provision a nominee may be viewed as having been confirmed by the Legislature even though he has been confirmed by only one house and his nomination has been rejected by the other house.

Jesse Unruh, who…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by754 opinions

  1. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

749 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API