Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Twin Coast Newspaper, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1959No. Civ. 23926PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action as against defendant-respondent Paul Shliff. The dismissal was ordered pursuant to section 581, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure, plaintiffs having failed to amend their third amended complaint within the time allowed by the court in an order sustaining a demurrer to said complaint on the ground that there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff.
Appellants were three chiropractors who practiced their profession at separate locations in the city of Long Beach. Respondent was an employee of the State Pood and Health Department,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Peters v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Aldrich v. Transcontinental Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Union Oil Co. v. DomengeauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anaya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Moe v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Petersen v. Bank of America Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hoag v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Jose Avila v. Atrium Medical CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.