Legal Opinion
Anaya v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1984No. Docket Nos. A027737, A027738PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
These two petitions, considered together for convenience, present the question of whether numerous employees of the Occidental Petroleum Corporation and their family members must sue separately for injuries alleged to have been caused by industrial contamination, Code of Civil Procedure section 378 permits joinder of plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief “arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences and if any question of law or fact common to all these persons will arise in the action; ...” We conclude that the trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Peters v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Aldrich v. Transcontinental Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Moe v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Royal Surplus Lines Insurance v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Petersen v. Bank of America Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- David v. Medtronic, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.