Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Transcontinental Land & Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1955No. Civ. 20323PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

Appeal by certain defendants from preliminary injunction and from orders denying motions to vacate the injunction.

There are 98 plaintiffs herein. The amended complaint sets forth 60 alleged “Counts,” and each “Count” sets forth two alleged “Causes of Action.” In each “Count” one or more of the plaintiffs make the allegations in each of the two causes of action in the “Count.” The first of the two causes of action in each “Count” alleges a rescission of a contract to purchase real property from defendants Continental Subdivisions, Inc., or Transcontinental Land and Water…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Kane v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Engleman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Adams v. AlbanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Curl v. Pacific HomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Porter v. Robert Porter & Sons, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Anaya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Allstate Leasing Corp. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Thomas H. Smith and the Yellow Cab Company of the District of Columbia, Inc. v. Mary M. Leigh and John E. LeighCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API