Legal Opinion

Hoag v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1962No. Civ. 26379PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a petition for writ of mandate to direct respondent court to transfer action now pending in the Los Angeles Superior Court against this petitioner to the Superior Court of the County of Orange.

On September 6, 1961, the real parties in interest herein, Irving W. Hall, George F. Murray and Robert J. Meisenbach, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, commenced an action seeking damages against each of four defendants, one of whom is petitioner, upon asserted grounds of invasion of privacy.

The complaint contains twelve causes of action, one on behalf of each of the three…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kraft v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Oppenheimer v. AshburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Monogram Co. v. KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Landau v. SalamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Southern California Edison Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API