Legal Opinion

Emery v. Pacific Employers Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1937No. L. A. 16049PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Jules C. Goldstone, Paul J. Ziegler and William Berger for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Plaintiffs Edna Earl Emery and Lillian M. Beal recovered judgment, in the sums of $1100 and $4,200, respectively, against James Bronis for personal injuries received when the automobile in which they were riding was struck by an automobile owned and driven by Bronis. The judgment being unpaid, they brought this action against defendant Pacific Employers Insurance Company upon a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by it to Bronis. From a judgment for plaintiffs upon a directed verdict defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The contention of the defendant insurance company is that the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Theatrical Stage Employees Union, Local 16California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Johnson v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API