Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Moe v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 2012No. C068872PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOCH, J.

This lawsuit arises from separate incidents of sexual assault allegedly committed by Scott Dodd Anderson, M.D. (Anderson), against two *828patients, Paula Moe and Edelmira Moe.1 Paula and Edelmira, along with their husbands, Robert and Richard, respectively, sued Anderson and two corporations alleged to be his employer, U.S. Healthworks, Inc., and U.S. Healthworks Medical Group, PC. (Healthworks), for medical malpractice, battery, sexual battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium. Defendants demurred, arguing that plaintiffs were improperly joined…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Bank of America Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. David v. Medtronic, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Doe v. San Diego Imperial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Dameron Hospital Assn. v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. David v. Medtronic, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API