Legal Opinion
Peters v. Bigelow
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1934No. Docket No. 4982PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HELD, J., pro tem.
The plaintiffs herein are David Peters and William Peters. The amended complaint contains two counts. In the first count, plaintiff David Peters alleges that on the eighteenth day of June, 1931, at or near Salyer, in the county of Trinity, the defendants by force compelled him to go to the town of Weaverville, and that said defendants did then and there imprison him in the county jail of Trinity County, and detain him therein and restrain him of his liberty for a period of approximately seven days, without probable cause, and without any right or authority so to do, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Collins v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.