Legal Opinion
Union Oil Co. v. Domengeaux
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 5, 1939No. Civ. 10938PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
The above-entitled actions were consolidated for trial and were tried by the court sitting without a jury. Findings were expressly waived and the trial court entered its judgment enjoining defendants from maintaining or operating a certain oil and gas well below a depth of 432 feet and ordering defendants to plug up and abandon all of said well below said depth in the manner provided by law. Plaintiffs were awarded costs against defendants in the sum of $102.55. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from the order denying defendants’ motion to retax costs.
The defendants’ contentions are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reichardt v. ReichardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- West Coast Construction Co. v. Oceano Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Anaya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Wixted v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Coleman v. Twin Coast Newspaper, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.