Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen of Chapel Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1974No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The factual background of this proceeding indicates that in the early stages, decisions were favorable to the petitioners. In the concluding stages, however, the Board of Aldermen disregarded the findings of the Planning Board and concluded, “that the use would materially endanger the public health and safety if located where proposed and developed according to' the plans as submitted.” These findings are tainted by evidence that the Board improperly considered a letter from the Highway Commission opposing the permit. This letter was dated nine days after the public hearing.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Jarrell v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF HIGH POINTSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Craver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Batch v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Stephenson v. Town of GarnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Pigford v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF CITY OF KINSTONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Ballas v. Town of WeavervilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API