Legal Opinion

Craver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1966No. 457PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The petitioners assign three grounds upon the basis of which they contend the judgment of the Superior Court should be reversed: (1) The hearing before the Board was based upon statements not under oath and those objecting to the special permit were heard by unverified petition and were not present for cross-examination; (2) the record of the hearing before the Board was not sufficiently comprehensive to permit the court to determine whether the Board had acted arbitrarily or had committed errors of law in denying the permit; (3) the standards set up by the Zoning ordinance are too vague and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Jarrell v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF HIGH POINTSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Austin v. BrunnemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Tate Terrace Realty Investors, Inc. v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Howard v. City of KinstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Melton v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. MCC Outdoor, LLC v. Town of Franklinton Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API