Jackson v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The mere fact that one’s proposed lawful use of his own land will diminish the value of adjoining or nearby lands of another does not give to such other person a standing to maintain an action, or other legal proceeding, to prevent such use. Harrington & Co. v. Renner, 236 N.C. 321, 72 S.E. 2d 838; 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Adjoining Landowners, § 2. If, however, the proposed use is unlawful, as where it is prohibited by a valid zoning ordinance, the owner of adjoining or nearby lands, who will sustain special damage from the proposed use through a reduction in the value of his own property, does have a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Smith v. School Trustees.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re Appeal of O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.