Legal Opinion
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 25, 1974No. 31PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
The first question which Humble, the petitioner-appellant, discusses in its brief is whether it has standing to challenge the Board’s denial of its application for the special use permit. This question was not raised at the joint hearing before the Aldermen and the Planning Board. However, in its answer to Humble’s petition to the Superior Court for a writ of certiorari, after responding to the merits of each averment, the Aldermen alleged “that the petitioner is not the proper party to apply for a special use permit, it being the holder of options only. . ... ”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Application of EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.