Legal Opinion

Jarrell v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF HIGH POINT

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1963No. 597PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

We cannot determine to what extent, if any, a provision identifiable as “Section 22.58 (n)” of a zoning ordinance is relevant. No ordinance provision so identified appears in .the record.

The record contains references to the “original Zoning Ordinance” of March 18, 1926, and to the Zoning Ordinance of November 18, 1947; but these ordinances, with the exception hereafter noted, do not appear in the record. The only ordinance provisions in the record are two excerpts, each relating solely to “nonconforming uses,” one apparently from an ordinance adopted in November, 1947, and the other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. In Re the Appeal of HastingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Little v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Brown v. GerhardtIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Chambers v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. North Carolina State Bar v. DuMontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Yancey v. HeafnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API