Legal Opinion

Batch v. Town of Chapel Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1989No. 8815SC340PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Summary judgment granted by the trial court recognized plaintiffs claims for violation of due process, taking, temporary taking, town action which exceeded statutory authority, inverse condemnation, and damages under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1988. Issues for decision by this Court are whether the trial court properly entertained the motion for summary judgment and, if so, whether it determined correctly that there existed no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Procedure

As an initial matter it is necessary to resolve…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Batch v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Franklin Road Properties v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Alston v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. HEMPHILL NOLAN v. Town of WeddingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Anderson Creek PartnersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API