Stephenson v. Town of Garner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Chief Judge.
In reviewing the trial court’s dismissal of Stephenson’s claims under Rules 12(b)(6) or 12(c), we evaluate all facts alleged and permissible inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to Stephenson. Shuford, N.C. Practice and Procedure, §§ 12-8, 12-10. If the facts as alleged by the plaintiff do not either (1) give rise to any claim upon which relief may be granted, Shuford, § 12-8, citing Andrews v. Elliot, 109 N.C. App. 271, 426 S.E.2d 430 (1993), or (2) show that the nonmoving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Shuford, § 12-10, citing Ragsdale v.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Goodman v. Holmes & McLaurin Attorneys at LawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Kaahumanu v. County Of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Redelsperger v. City of AvondaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Kaahumanu v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.