Legal Opinion
In Re Jones
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 1996No. 95-BG-377, 95-BG-878PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
On January 13, 1995, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania suspended respondent David A. Jones for a period of one year and one day from practice in that jurisdiction. 1 The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that reciprocal discipline be imposed and that Jones be suspended from practice in the District of Columbia for one year and one day, reinstatement to be conditioned on a showing of fitness to practice law. Neither Jones nor Bar Counsel has filed an exception to the Board’s Recommendation with us pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 9(e). 2
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re YoumansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re GeorgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re HerminaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006