Legal Opinion
In re George
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1999No. 98-BG-334PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
On February 18, 1998, the Court of Appeals of Maryland suspended respondent David E. George from the practice of law in Maryland for a period of sixty days commencing on May 1, 1998. The suspension was to be followed by a six-month supervised probationary period, subject to an additional six months should the practice monitor not be satisfied with respondent’s cooperation. Respondent admitted to violating MARYLAND Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3 (failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness), 1.4 (failing to keep client reasonably informed), 1.8(h) (entering into a prohibited…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Location Realty, Inc. v. ColaccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008