Legal Opinion
In re Hermina
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 2006No. 04-BG-246PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this reciprocal discipline proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has concluded, as did the Maryland Court of Appeals, that respondent John W. Hermina violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 3.3(a)(1) (making false statement of material fact to a tribunal), 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying *792obligations under rules of tribunal), 8.2 (making false statement as to qualification or integrity of a judge), and 8.4(a), (c)-(d) (violating Rules of Professional Conduct, conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, and conduct prejudicial to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re ZakroffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re WoodDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011