Legal Opinion
In Re Youmans
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 1991No. 90-582PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This reciprocal discipline matter arises from New Jersey’s two-year suspension of Respondent for a number of violations of that state’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Our Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that reciprocal discipline be imposed in our jurisdiction. See D.C. Bar Rule XI § 11. Respondent has not made any appearance or entered any opposition either before the Board or before us. We accept the Board’s recommendation.
Following proceedings at which Respondent appeared and testified, the New Jersey Supreme Court found that he had engaged in numerous disciplinary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of SheehyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re GregoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re MintzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.