Legal Opinion

In Re Slosberg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1994No. 93-BG-1010PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Senior Judge:

This disciplinary matter is before this court on the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that reciprocal discipline be imposed on respondent. Bar Counsel supports the recommendation. We agree that the imposition of reciprocal discipline is appropriate.

On July 8, 1993, the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine suspended respondent Richard B. Slosberg for one year, suspended execution of all but three months of the suspension “for a two year period following the three month suspension,” and placed him on probation for that two-year period…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In Re SpiridonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re MeislerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API