Legal Opinion

In Re Goldsborough

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1995No. 93-BG-650PublishedCited by 269 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

In this reciprocal disciplinary proceeding against respondent George J. Goldsborough, a member of our Bar since 1953, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that this court suspend Goldsbor-ough from practice for two years and that we condition reinstatement upon proof of fitness. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation having been filed, we impose the discipline proposed by the Board.

I

The facts of this unusual case are set forth in detail in the opinion of the Maryland Court of Appeals, Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Alan Neuman Productions, Inc. v. Jere AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. FruehaufSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by269 opinions

  1. In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. In Re VieheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API