Legal Opinion
In Re Zilberberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 4, 1992No. 91-SP-209PublishedCited by 198 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
On January 5, 1987, respondent Zilber-berg, an attorney, was suspended from the practice of law in the state of Virginia for three years. The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board found that Mr. Zilberberg had violated Virginia Disciplinary Rules 1-102 (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), 9-102 (commingling, failure to notify client promptly of receipt of funds, and failure to pay client such funds promptly on request), and 9-103 (failure to maintain detailed records of client funds).1 After the District of Columbia Bar Counsel forwarded…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by198 opinions
- In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.