Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hereford

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1983No. OSB 81-101, SC 29414PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against G. Brock Hereford accusing him of unethical conduct in two separate causes. The first cause involves Hereford’s conduct after he was retained by Sandra Letterman to prepare documents necessary to form an Oregon corporation and obtain a Sub-chapter S classification with the Internal Revenue Service. The second cause involves Hereford’s conduct in a civil case in Multnomah County wherein he had been retained to represent the defendant, Dale Fenske.

The Trial Board found Hereford guilty of all the charges in each cause of the complaint. It…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GygiOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RobesonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LoewOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CollierOregon Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaauweOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In re Complaint as to Conduct of HillOregon Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API