Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eads

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1987No. OSB 83-96, 83-112; SC S32005; OSB 84-81, 85-68; SC S32891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter involves two separate lawyer disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Oregon State Bar against the accused, John W. Eads, Jr. The first proceeding was instituted by the Bar in May 1984 (Eads II) 1 and argued in this court on December 3, 1985. At argument on Eads II, the court was informed that additional charges were being investigated involving the accused. Thereafter, when the opinion of the trial panel in the more recent case (Eads III) was filed with the court, the court proposed withholding decision on Eads II until Eads III was argued and submitted. Neither the accused nor…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RobesonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re GreggOregon Supreme Court · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Matter of ClyneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API