Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paauwe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1984No. SC S30944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary case the accused was charged by the Oregon State Bar with violations of DR 1-102(A)(4), 1 DR 6-101(A)(3), 2 DR 7-101(A)(2), 3 DR 7-101(A)(3) 4 and DR 1-103(C). 5

The Trial Board found the accused guilty of violating all the charges except DR 1-102(A)(4). 6 The Trial Board recommended suspension from the practice of law for a period of one year to be imposed only if, during a period of three years, the accused fails to: (1) refrain entirely from the use of intoxicants and continues actively in an alcohol rehabilitation program, (2) discontinue the delay and neglect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CristOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CollierOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaauweOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VaileOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GermundsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API