In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paauwe
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary case the accused was charged by the Oregon State Bar with violations of DR 1-102(A)(4), 1 DR 6-101(A)(3), 2 DR 7-101(A)(2), 3 DR 7-101(A)(3) 4 and DR 1-103(C). 5
The Trial Board found the accused guilty of violating all the charges except DR 1-102(A)(4). 6 The Trial Board recommended suspension from the practice of law for a period of one year to be imposed only if, during a period of three years, the accused fails to: (1) refrain entirely from the use of intoxicants and continues actively in an alcohol rehabilitation program, (2) discontinue the delay and neglect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CristOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CollierOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaauweOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VaileOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GermundsonOregon Supreme Court · 1986