Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Collier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1983No. OSB 79-63 and 80-42, SC 29105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Jack E. Collier accusing him of unethical conduct in two separate causes. The first cause involves Collier’s alleged failure to file a reply to a counterclaim which resulted in a default judgment being entered against his client. The second cause concerns a different matter wherein it is alleged that Collier failed to prepare and submit an order when requested to do so by a judge.

The Trial Board found that Collier was guilty of a portion of the first cause of complaint and not guilty of the second cause and the remaining portion of the first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GygiOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McCaffreyOregon Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SamuelsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re BourcierOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MagarOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API