In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Collier
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Jack E. Collier accusing him of unethical conduct in two separate causes. The first cause involves Collier’s alleged failure to file a reply to a counterclaim which resulted in a default judgment being entered against his client. The second cause concerns a different matter wherein it is alleged that Collier failed to prepare and submit an order when requested to do so by a judge.
The Trial Board found that Collier was guilty of a portion of the first cause of complaint and not guilty of the second cause and the remaining portion of the first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GygiOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McCaffreyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SamuelsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re BourcierOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MagarOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.