Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Robeson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1982No. OSB 79-22, SC 28197PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar filed an amended complaint against Vincent G. Robeson accusing him of unethical conduct in nine separate causes. All causes of action allege that Robeson was guilty of unethical conduct in that he violated the Discliplinary Rules of the Oregon State Bar and the Oregon Revised Statutes in his dealings with his client, Ruth Merwin, during 1976.
Robeson has been a member of the Oregon State Bar since 1964. An interoffice memo of a bank listed Merwin’s age in 1976 as 60. Merwin was the beneficiary of a revocable trust which she had created naming a bank as trustee. Immediately…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- People v. RobnettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SamuelsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.