Legal Opinion

In re Complaint as to Conduct of Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1984No. OSB 80-82, 81-78, 82-6; SC 29772PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding brought by the Oregon State Bar, the accused was charged by an amended complaint with eight separate causes of complaint ranging over a three-year period, involving four different clients and resulting in fourteen separate alleged violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and one violation of statute. Personal service of the complaint, the amended complaint, and notice to answer were made on the accused in California. Notices reporting the appointment of the Trial Board and the date, time and place of the hearing on the amended complaint were mailed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CollierOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API