Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Loew

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1982No. OSB 80-26, SC 28180PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Oregon State Bar. The accused is charged with violation of the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

“(1) DR 1-102 Misconduct

(A) A lawyer shall not:

‡ sfc He %(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.

“(2) DR 6-101 Failing to Act Competently (A) A lawyer shall not:(3) Neglect a legal matter entrusted to him.
“(3) DR 7-101 Representing a Client Zealously (A) A lawyer shall not intentionally:(2) fail to carry out a contract of employment entered into with a client for…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ColstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SchraederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SousaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API