Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Burdine

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 29, 1989No. ACMR 8800562, ACMR 8901139 and ACMR 8702187PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON MOTION TO STAY ORDERS

MYERS, Senior Judge:

On 20 September, 27 September, and 28 September 1989, respectively, this court issued orders directing appellate government counsel to obtain affidavits from trial defense counsel in the above-captioned cases in response to personally-asserted allegations of the appellants, pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A.1982), of ineffective assistance of trial defense counsel. On 10 October 1989 an in-chambers hearing was held at the request of appellate government counsel whereat they requested a stay of our said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. PeelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. DupasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. CrumU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. LewisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. MelsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API