Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Dupas

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 30, 1982No. 43197/AR; CM 440507PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

After a general court-martial had convicted him of rape, appellant claimed that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial- — especially by reason of counsel’s failure to call a possible alibi witness. In connection with this claim, appellate defense counsel requested access to the file of Captain Ogilvie, the trial defense counsel. Upon failure to receive access, he submitted to Ogilvie certain specific questions concerning Ogilvie’s preparation for trial and the reasons for certain tactical choices made at trial. At the same time, he…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  3. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. BurdineU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. MaysUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. McClainCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API