Legal Opinion

United States v. Melson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 30, 2008No. 08-5003/AFPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court.

Applying the principles set forth in United States v. Ginn, 47 M.J. 236 (C.A.A.F.1997), the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that Staff Sergeant Benny C. Melson’s defense counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a claim of illegal pretrial punishment at trial under Article 13, *347Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 813 (2000). United States v. Melson, No. ACM 36523, 2007 CCA LEXIS 372, at *18, 2007 WL 2791708, at *6 (A.F.Ct.Crim. App. Sept. 14, 2007) (unpublished). As a result of that determination, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. GrigorukCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. BurdineU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Specialist JOHN A. GUNDERMAN, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  2. United States v. Private E1 JORDAN R. AXTELLArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  3. United States v. Captain ADAM J. MYERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
  4. United States v. Major JASON A. SCOTTArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  5. United States v. McCALLNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API